GenesisAeon

Katalog

P122 · v1.0.0 · 2026-09-01

Ocean Acidification

ocean-acidification-utac

Kein UTAC/CREP/AFET-BridgeOzeanMIT

Real ocean acidification planetary-boundary science (Findlay et al. 2025, Global Change Biology: boundary crossed globally, ~40% surface / ~60% subsurface to 200m) including the boundary metric's own active scientific revision (Findlay & Feely 2026, National Science Review: the original 80% threshold doesn't satisfy its own justifying criteria). Deliberately no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge -- see DISCLAIMER.md. GenesisAeon P122.

Live von GitHub, Stand 11.09.2026, 20:41

Laienverständliche Fassung (Deutsch)

Paket-DOI

Keine eigene Paket-DOI in CITATION.cff oder .zenodo.json.

Quellen-DOIs

Literatur je Paket

  1. Ocean Acidification: Another Planetary Boundary Crossed

    Global Change Biology, 2025

    10.1111/gcb.70238
  2. Revisiting the ocean acidification planetary boundary

    National Science Review, 2026

    10.1093/nsr/nwag173

Schlagworte

GenesisAeonP122climateocean acidificationplanetary boundaryopen-science

Disclaimer

DISCLAIMER — Real Science, the Boundary's Own Definition Under Active Revision

Why no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge: not only because the cited literature already provides the necessary quantitative structure -- a deliberate choice. This project's highly speculative AFET/UTAC experiments must never stand in the way of climate/ecology topics being accessible and usable to people who don't work inside that construct and aren't looking for renormalization groups. Real, checkable science, without the burden of an unproven framework. See PACKAGE_REGISTRY.md's "Why no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge in the climate/ecology series" (2026-08-31) in the GenesisAeon workspace root for the full canonical note.

Status: Real, independently verified science, including a real, ongoing scientific revision of the package's own headline metric. NO UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge.

Where this package came from

Surfaced via a six-document multi-AI gap-analysis of the GenesisAeon climate/ecology portfolio (KlimaAktuell/, six independently-produced documents: ChatGPT, Claude-Web, Gemini, MSCopilot, Vibe, Grok, 2026-09-01), cross-checked against PACKAGE_REGISTRY.md to confirm ocean acidification was a genuine, uncovered gap, then independently deep-dive re-verified (a second research pass specifically checking for overlooked complications/updates) before building.

What this is

Every citation checked directly via WebSearch/WebFetch against publisher/press pages, 2026-09-01.

  • **Findlay, H.S., Feely, R.A., Jiang, L.-Q., Pelletier, G., Bednarsek,
  • N. (2025)*, Global Change Biology*, e70238, DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70238
  • — real, peer-reviewed: the ocean acidification planetary boundary
  • (defined via aragonite saturation state, Omega-arag, dropping to 80%
  • of pre-industrial levels

README

Technische Dokumentation (Englisch)

ocean-acidification-utac

GenesisAeon Package 122 — real ocean acidification planetary-boundary science, including the boundary metric's own active scientific revision. Deliberately has no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge — see DISCLAIMER.md.

For a plain-language explanation of the same topic (German, no jargon, written for general audiences), see WHITEPAPER.md.

Where this package came from

Surfaced via a six-document multi-AI gap-analysis of the GenesisAeon climate/ecology portfolio (KlimaAktuell/, 2026-09-01), then independently deep-dive verified before building — alongside tropical-glacier-ecosystem-rle-utac (P123), marine-compound-stressors-utac (P124), assisted-gene-flow-utac (P125), and climate-landuse-biodiversity-nexus-utac (P126).

What's real here

  • Findlay et al. (2025, Global Change Biology)* — the ocean
  • acidification planetary boundary has been crossed globally: ~40% of
  • surface ocean and ~60% of subsurface ocean (to 200m), crossing
  • estimated to have begun around 2020. The boundary's own explicit
  • framing: this is not a tipping point — no abrupt, self-reinforcing
  • regime shift is implied, and reversal via reduced emissions is
  • theoretically possible.
  • Findlay & Feely (2026, National Science Review)* — the SAME lead
  • author revisiting the boundary and finding it doesn't hold up on its
  • own terms: the original 80%-of-preindustrial threshold was meant to
  • (1) prevent polar undersaturation and (2) protect warm-water coral
  • reefs — but Arctic waters are already undersaturated today, and
  • reefs would actually need an 85%, not 80%, threshold.

Quickstart

bash pip install ocean-acidification-utac

```python from ocean_acidification_utac import ( surface_ocean_boundary_crossed_pct, subsurface_ocean_boundary_crossed_pct, is_boundary_crossing_a_tipping_point, does_80pct_threshold_meet_original_criteria, is_arctic_already_undersaturated_today, )

print(surface_ocean_boundary_crossed_pct()) # 40.0 print(subsurface_ocean_boundary_crossed_pct()) # 60.0 print(is_boundary_crossing_a_tipping_point()) # False print(does_80pct_threshold_meet_original_criteria()) # False -- the honesty check print(is_arctic_already_undersaturated_today()) # True ```

Development

bash pip install -e ".[dev]" pre-commit install ruff check src tests mypy src pytest

Citation

See CITATION.cff and .zenodo.json.

Verwandte Pakete

Marine Physiologie

marine-compound-stressors-utac (P124) ist der explizite Verbinder über den Metabolic Index (Deutsch et al. 2015), koppelt ocean-deoxygenation/coral-reef/marine-heatwave. ocean-acidification-utac (P122) und P124 beschreiben denselben Versauerungstrend aus zwei Blickwinkeln (Planetary-Boundary- vs. Compound-Event-Statistik).