GenesisAeon

Katalog

P102 · v1.0.1 · 2026-08-31

Paraglacial Hazard

paraglacial-hazard-utac

Kein UTAC/CREP/AFET-BridgeKryosphäreHydrologieExtreme & KaskadenKohlenstoffMIT

Paraglacial and geophysical hazard science: GIA/seismicity context (a real Western Alps contrast case), permafrost-driven rock-slope instability, and glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) exposure. Companion to glacial-seismicity-utac (P101). Deliberately no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge. GenesisAeon P102.

Live von GitHub, Stand 11.09.2026, 20:52

Laienverständliche Fassung (Deutsch)

Paket-DOI

Keine eigene Paket-DOI in CITATION.cff oder .zenodo.json.

Quellen-DOIs

Literatur je Paket

  1. Glacial-isostatic-adjustment strain rate-stress paradox in the Western Alps and impact on active faults and seismicity

    Solid Earth, 2023

    10.5194/se-14-1067-2023
  2. Paraglacial geomorphology

    Quaternary Science Reviews, 2002

    10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00005-7
  3. Influence of permafrost degradation and glacier retreat on recent high mountain rockfall distribution in the eastern European Alps

    Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2025

    10.1002/esp.70063
  4. Permafrost in steep bedrock slopes and its temperature-related destabilization following climate change

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2007

    10.1029/2006JF000547
  5. Glacial lake outburst floods threaten millions globally

    Nature Communications, 2023

    10.1038/s41467-023-36033-x
  6. A global database of historic glacier lake outburst floods

    Earth System Science Data, 2023

    10.5194/essd-15-2983-2023

Schlagworte

GenesisAeonP102climateglaciergeohazardpermafrostGLOFopen-science

Disclaimer

DISCLAIMER — Real Science, No Framework Bridge

Why no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge: not only because the cited literature already provides the necessary quantitative structure -- a deliberate choice. This project's highly speculative AFET/UTAC experiments must never stand in the way of climate/ecology topics being accessible and usable to people who don't work inside that construct and aren't looking for renormalization groups. Real, checkable science, without the burden of an unproven framework. See PACKAGE_REGISTRY.md's "Why no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge in the climate/ecology series" (2026-08-31) in the GenesisAeon workspace root for the full canonical note.

Status: Real, independently verified science. NO UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge.

What this is

Every figure in this package was checked directly against the paper (DOI lookup, publisher abstract, or press summary) on 2026-08-14.

  • Grosset, Mazzotti & Vernant (2023), Solid Earth 14, 1067-1081,
  • DOI: 10.5194/se-14-1067-2023 — a real, contrasting GIA case for the
  • Western Alps: GIA explains much of the observed geodetic strain rate
  • but its stress perturbations tend to either inhibit fault slip or
  • promote the wrong failure mechanism relative to observed seismicity.
  • The authors conclude GIA does not drive or promote the Western Alps'
  • current seismicity — even though seismic hazard studies there still
  • need detailed GIA modeling for other reasons. This complements, not
  • contradicts, P101's Alaska case (where GIA-induced stress plausibly
  • did help promote the 1958 Fairweather Fault earthquake).
  • Ballantyne (2002), Quaternary Science Reviews 21(18-19),
  • 1935-2017, DOI: 10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00005-7 — the foundational,
  • extremely widely cited paraglacial-geomorphology review. R

README

Technische Dokumentation (Englisch)

paraglacial-hazard-utac

GenesisAeon Package 102 — paraglacial and geophysical hazard science. Companion to glacial-seismicity-utac (P101): extends GIA/seismicity with a real contrasting case, and adds two more real paraglacial hazard domains. Deliberately has no UTAC/CREP/AFET bridge — see DISCLAIMER.md.

For a plain-language explanation of the same topic (German, no jargon, written for general audiences), see WHITEPAPER.md.

What's real here

  • GIA context (gia_context.py): Grosset, Mazzotti & Vernant
  • (2023, Solid Earth) — in the Western Alps, GIA explains much of
  • the observed geodetic deformation but does not drive the
  • observed seismicity. A real contrast to P101's Alaska/Fairweather
  • case, where GIA-induced stress plausibly did help promote a specific
  • large earthquake. GIA "explains deformation" and "drives seismicity"
  • are two independent questions — this module makes that explicit.
  • Permafrost & rock-slope instability (slope_instability.py):
  • Ballantyne (2002)'s foundational paraglacial-geomorphology concept
  • (post-deglaciation landscapes are unstable, activity declines over
  • time) plus a real, recent dataset — Fey, Wichmann & Zangerl (2025,
  • ESPL) found permafrost terrain (22% of their Eastern Alps study
  • area) hosts 76% of rockfalls, and terrain deglaciated since 1969
  • (4.7% of the area) hosts 40% of rockfalls. Mechanism: Gruber &
  • Haeberli (2007, JGR).
  • GLOF exposure (glof.py): Taylor, Robinson, Dunning et al.
  • (2023, Nature Communications) — 15 million people globally exposed
  • to glacial lake outburst flood risk, over half in India, Pakistan,
  • Peru and China. Lützow, Veh & Korup (2023, ESSD) — the historic
  • event record (3,151 events, 850–2022 CE, 27 countries) is dominated
  • by NW North America and Iceland instead — **event frequency and
  • human exposure are different, weakly correlated risk axes.**

Quickstart

bash pip install paraglacial-hazard-utac

```python from paraglacial_hazard_utac import ( WESTERN_ALPS, is_deformation_seismicity_paradox, permafrost_overrepresentation_factor, recently_deglaciated_overrepresentation_factor, GLOBAL_EXPOSURE, HISTORIC_RECORD, )

print(is_deformation_seismicity_paradox(WESTERN_ALPS)) # True print(permafrost_overrepresentation_factor()) # ~3.45 print(recently_deglaciated_overrepresentation_factor()) # ~8.5 print(GLOBAL_EXPOSURE.exposed_population_millions) # 15.0 print(HISTORIC_RECORD.nw_north_america_share_pct) # 26.0 ```

Development

bash pip install -e ".[dev]" pre-commit install ruff check src tests mypy src pytest

Citation

See CITATION.cff and [.zenod

Verwandte Pakete

Gletscher & Kryosphäre

Die explizit im Ökosystem selbst so benannte 'P99-P103-Serie' (glacier-buffer -> glacier-buffer-replacement, 'companion to P99' -> distributed-buffer-resilience, 'companion to P99 and P100'), mit mountain-governance-adaptation-utac (P104) als selbstbezeichnetem 'governance/institutional closing chapter of the P99-P103 series'. black-carbon-albedo-utac (P105) ist explizit 'a new atmospheric-deposition lens on the P99-P104 series'. freshwater-ecosystem-stressors-utac (P106) ist explizit 'the ecological bridge between the P99-P102 physical series and the P103-P104 resilience/governance series'. landscape-restoration-hydrology-utac (P107) 'extends the P99/P103 distributed-buffer series'; urban-green-infrastructure-utac (P108) ist explizit 'companion to landscape-restoration-hydrology-utac (P107)'. glacier-legacy-contaminants-utac (P109) 'bridges glacier-buffer-utac (P99), black-carbon-albedo-utac (P105), and freshwater-ecosystem-stressors-utac (P106)'. snowpack-elevation-warming-utac (P110) 'quantifies distributed-buffer-resilience-utac's (P103) unquantified snow buffer category and extends glacier-buffer-utac's (P99) peak-water framing'. tropical-glacier-ecosystem-rle-utac (P123) erweitert den Puffer-Verlust-Mechanismus in Richtung IUCN-RLE-Kollaps-Diagnostik. glacier-microbiome-succession-utac (P129) benennt sich selbst als verwandt zu, aber unterschieden von, P99/P106/P123 (siehe sein eigenes relative_change_honesty_check-Modul) -- dokumentiert die Physikochemie und das Mikrobiom des Gletscherbachs selbst, nicht Abflussmenge, Ökosystem-Stress oder RLE-Status. Alle Zitate stammen wörtlich aus den jeweiligen Paket-Abstracts.